Articles Comments

Alphaverse.com » Featured

Logical Proposition; Digital media vs conventional media

4004735013_55cf0a1ed0News Corp. Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch set the Internet abuzz Monday after an interview appeared online in which he said the company is considering blocking Google from being able to search its Web sites. I think we’ve been asleep” is what he said. Echoing accusations of parasitism and kleptomania that other News Corp. execs have levied against Google for featuring their content on Google sites, Mr. Murdoch said search companies “steal our stories”.

Well, I guess I’ll quit quoting him now before I get sued… this article has been posted on Wall Street Journal for free, yet…

My reaction is that of formal logic.  Here’s what the old and conventional establishment Murdoch overlooked.

1.) Digitalization of information

  • Premise 1: digital media is more efficient (from the world of atoms to the world of bits) → (true)
  • Premise 2: news=information. information (i.e news) is/has been/can be digitalized ≡ a fact → (true)
  • Premise 3: digitalized information is easier to: a.) store, b.) distribute, c.) produce, d.) reproduce → (true)

∩ Argument: digital media is factually more efficient! → logically valid and all premises are true.

Murdoch seems to agree with this, so far so good.

2.) Democratization of information

  • Premise 4: production of information (i.e. Twitter, YouTube, the Net) is democratized, and is more efficient (i.e. individuals, PC, mobile phones, versus typemachines, pencils, paper, journalists in hotels etc.) ≡ (true)
  • Premise 5: distribution of information is democratized, and is more efficient (i.e. geographic distances are irrelevant, time between production, transport en distribution closes to/is miliseconds, wordwide ≡ (true)

∩ Argument: democratized digital information distribution & production is more cost-effective then conventional → logically valid and all premises are true.

Thus, by inference:

→→ Logical deduction: If digital information is factually more cost-efficient (which is true), and its production & distribution is democratized (which is true), then it is logical to say that digital media IS econimically more efficient and cost-effective!

∑→ Logical conclusion: If it is so that the feasibility of an economic model demands superior efficiency and cost-effectiveness over its rivals (as dictates the ‘economic theory’), then it is logical to conclude that, in the long term, the business model of the digital media will be superior of that of the conventional media.

It is, therefore, only logical that Murdoch and Co. will lose. Right?! It’s formal logic.

VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rate this!
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Filed under: Digital media, Featured

Shooting at Sarajevo… obviously, a collective delusion constructed by ‘The Turks’!?

Minaret and Clock Tower at Night SarajevoStatement: The accused, Radovan Karadzic, knew throughout the course of the 44-month siege that his forces were shelling and sniping at civilians and creating conditions of terror for the citizens of Sarajevo.

Eduard Limonov, now of “Other Russia” opposition, seen here on the hills above Sarajevo, next to war criminal Radovan Karadzic. Limonov, now an “opposition activist”, together with chess master Garry Kasparov… for whatever that may mean… However, this video is from an episode from “Serbian Epic”, by Pawel Pawlikowski, 1992. Is has also been served as evidence exhibit at the Hague International War Crimes Tribunal, ICTY in the Hague.

This is what the proprietary conduct dictates so I’ll be legally responsible here:

All clips remain the sole property of the respective copyright holders. No videos are for sale, nor do they imply challenge to ownerships. They are intended strictly for educational and historical purposes, and fall under the “Fair Use” guideline.

VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rate this!
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Filed under: Bosnia, Collapse of Society, Featured

“Think fast. Think under pressure. Think strategically.” Kasparov vs empty suits, 26 – 0

kasparov94“Ultimately, what separates a winner from a loser at the grandmaster level is the willingness to do the unthinkable. A brilliant strategy is, certainly, a matter of intelligence, but intelligence without audaciousness is not enough. Given the opportunity, I must have the guts to explode the game, to upend my opponent’s thinking and, in so doing, unnerve him. So it is in business: One does not succeed by sticking to convention. When your opponent can easily anticipate every move you make, your strategy deteriorates and becomes commoditized. “Garry Kasparov, FastCompany.com, September 2004.

Garry Kasparov at Your Next Move; score Kasparov 26 – the rest 0

Think fast. Think under pressure. Think strategically. That’s how you win in business… and in chess. “Our chess tournaments were certainly three of the most prestigious business events of 2007 & 2008.” That is the motto of Your Next Move.

The event was recently posted on YouTube. The following videos show highlights from the event. The videos feature comments by the English Grandmaster Nigel Short. Special attention is payed to the game of Chris Lanckriet (BNP Paribas Fortis IS Development Officer) who survived for 48 moves against Kasparov before resigning. Each of the following three segments are ten minutes long.

On October 13th 2009 Your Next Move organized a chess event in Antwerp, Belgium, for business executives, politicians & children. It was held for the third time, & for the third time it centered aound Garry Kasparov, former World Chess Champion (1985-2000). Kasparov played a simultaneous exhibition against 26 opponents – business executives nominated by the different companies and politicians partnering with and sponsoring the exclusive business event.



VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rate this!
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Filed under: Chess, Featured

A historical testimony to the US congress! Or is it?!

Can you recall a moment when you could honestly say ‘I told you so’, but when no one listens? Well this just might be one of those for me.

Taleb's testimony to the congress

This Thursday September the 10th marks perhaps a historic development for both Washington and the financial markets. The US Congress’ Committee on Science and Technology held a hearing on the responsibility of mathematical model Value at Risk for the credit crisis.

Nassim Taleb has been invited as expert witness by the Committee. Being a real derivatives trader for decades, Taleb has been warning about VaR’s potential for destruction for at least 13 years.

Read the official Report on The Risks of Financial Modeling, VaR and the Economic Breakdown by Dr. Nassim N. Taleb here.

While  Taleb was kicking ass in the US capital, I would like to contribute to the crusade by illuminating some insights from the now famous book The Black Swan.

For those mortal bipedal, carbon-based humanoid lifeforms with any significant level of complexity in their neo-cortical pathways who didn’t realize; ‘The Black Swan’ is not just another book. It in fact is a compilation of empirically valid phychological and logically coherent philosophical insights into the human mind and behavior, including the world around us, in which some thoughtful guy warns us for our ‘intellectuall arrogance’ and predisposed incompetence to harness the consequences of randomness in life, or any social situation for that matter.

This he eloquently calls ‘The Black Swans’, which is a technical name for the problem of induction in philosophy of science, especially social sciences that is.

I’ve always hoped, but never thought, that Nassim Taleb would get to be heard by the US congress.  Is he just casting ‘pearls to swines’ here (as some guy called Jesus once said it) or is he really being heard?

Taleb, after 13 years of fighting against complex derivatives and bogus quantitative risk management, finally got his say in congress last week on 10-09-2009. In this video compilation you can see a few of the points he made there.

Nassim Taleb testifies before Congress, under oath, and uses his insights in errors conducted by humans in complex systems, like the financial markets, to warn against mishandling of these errors and the (im)morality of deficit spending and the culture of incentivizing failures with bonuses.

In short, the man gives his view on the current financial and economic crisis.

In addition, he also warns of the risks of hyperinflation and presents his technical work on the concept of ‘too big to fail’ (also discussed earlier here) which is directly applicable to the comtemporary banking and monetary systems. Taleb also refers to his previous articles, also discussed on this website, concerning the ever growig complexity in the world, economic ‘charlatanism’ and how to identify the situations that are inherently unpredictable. He also discusses his “Fourth Quadrant” of risks society should not bear because we cannot measure them.

For the technical appendix of the latter concerning Taleb’s article called “The Forth Quadrant” look here.

Taleb also opens a, not so suprising, frontal attack at the ‘Value at Risk’ (VaR) method. Value at Risk are the risk measuments methods used by Wall Street to hide risks and collect bonuses, and are, by the way, still taught at business schools accross the world albeit out of mere ignorance or paradigmati intellectual arrogance.

Although I didn’t compile the video, I would guess that these are just some of the rhetorical highlights needed to give an impression of his testimony to the congress about the financial markets and the contemporary economic situation the US, and the world. Surely, more is to follow so stay tuned.

VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rate this!
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.0_1031]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Filed under: Featured, Financial Crisis, Nassim Taleb, The Black Swan