Original source: SimoleonSense.com .
Fun read!!
Abstract (Via Gigerenzer)
Most so-called “errors” in probabilistic reasoning are in fact not violations of probability theory. Examples of such “errors” include overconfi dence bias, conjunction fallacy, and base-rate neglect. Researchers have relied on a very narrow normative view, and have ignored conceptual distinctions—for example, single case versus relative frequency—fundamental to probability theory. By recognizing and using these distinctions, however, we can make apparently stable “errors” disappear, reappear, or even invert. I suggest what a reformed understanding of judgments under uncertainty might look like.
Click Here To Read: How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”
- On the Relative Independence of Thinking Biases and Cognitive Ability
- Cognitive Biases & The Judgement of Global Risk
- Video: Dan Ariely Cognitive Illusions & Irrational Behavior
- Analyst Are You Overconfident ? Quantifying Cognitive Biases in Analyst Earnings Forecasts
Alphaverse.com uses this content with author’s permission purely for educational purposes. Go to the feed source of this article





