Original source: SimoleonSense.com .
Abstract (via Scholer, Abigail A.; Zou, Xi; Fujita, Kentaro; Stroessner, Steven J.; Higgins, E. Tory )
Four studies demonstrate the importance of self-regulatory mechanisms for understanding risk-seeking behavior under loss. Findings suggest that risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity under 3 conditions: (a) when an individual is in a state of loss; (b) when the individual is in a prevention-focused regulatory state (E. T. Higgins, 1997); and (c) when the risky option alone offers the possibility of eliminating loss. In situations involving loss, prevention motivation but not promotion motivation (whether measured or manipulated) was uniquely associated with behaviors that served the motivation to maintain the status quo. When the risky option offered the sole possibility of returning to the status quo, prevention motivation predicted increased risk seeking. However, when a more conservative option was available that also offered the possibility to return to the status quo, prevention motivation predicted risk aversion. When neither option offered the possibility to return to the status quo, prevention motivation was not associated with risky choice. The authors discuss the benefits of complementing existing accounts of risky decision making under loss with regulatory focus motivational mechanisms.
Click Here to Read: When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity
- Why Poor People Play The Lotto: Myopic risk-seeking: The impact of narrow decision bracketing on lottery play
- The rich get richer and the poor get poorer: On risk aversion in behavioral decision-making
- Risk attitude and preference
- The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks
Alphaverse.com uses this content with author’s permission purely for educational purposes. Go to the feed source of this article





